Wenling Shoe Manufacturers Hold A Forum On Intellectual Property Rights

"Illegal copying", "trademark infringement", "technical disclosure"... along with Footwear industry in Wenling Sustained and rapid development, the infringement of intellectual property rights and the violation of shoe enterprises are coming to a more frequent period. In order to strengthen industry self-discipline, and in order to let Wenling shoe industry have a benign development space, rely on legal weapons to escort Wenling footwear industry. At 3 p.m. on April 24th, Li Wei, vice president of the intermediate people's Court of Taizhou and Chen Wentong, President of the Wenling Municipal People's court, held 15 people in the four floor of the General Chamber of Commerce and the Wenling shoe making enterprises to hold a symposium on intellectual property rights of footwear enterprises in Wenling.

according to Wenling City Dai Jingmiao, President of the intellectual property court of the people's court, said at the meeting that in recent years, there have been many trends in Wenling's shoe industry related legal disputes related to intellectual property protection. In the five cases that were closed last year, the defendants were prosecuted for counterfeiting counterfeit sports brands at home and abroad (Eddie Das, Anta, etc.). The infringement amounts were between 5-15 yuan.

In the interactive session of the symposium, shoemaking enterprises actively speak to provide relevant cases, and the judges attending the meeting will explain and analyze them one by one.

There is an internal brand enterprise that reflects the following cases: in recent years, eight shoe shops appeared in front of Fanchang District in our city. They sold the new season footwear to the Wenling stores at an alarming speed, and sold them to local shoe factories and hand-made workshops for shoes imitation at the price of 100 yuan to 200 yuan, so that the brand products were copied by a large number of copies, thus seriously affecting the sales and reputation of the brand enterprises. In order to protect their brand products from infringement, the independent brand enterprises can only dredge privately with the shoe store at the price of 2000-5000 yuan per quarter. Several shoe stores have been in the market for a year, and the relevant shoe factories have to spend several thousand to 10000 yuan for no reason.

Judge's weapon: on the one hand, enterprises should strengthen their self-protection awareness and establish product development process. intellectual property right Protection mechanism; two applications for registration of designs or registration rights.

Case two: high priced samples bought from abroad are stolen in the development room or hidden by salesmen. Their shoe factories have not yet been listed, and the other shoe factories have been listed on the same products.

Judge's weapon: we must guard against the signing of conservative business secrets and technical secret agreements with salesmen and developers, etc., and pay attention to search evidence to prosecute the public security and judicial departments.

Case three: Hengfeng brand glue merchants encounter three worries. First, their products are shoddy by unauthorized peddlers who are not authorized to sell, thereby damaging the reputation of manufacturers; second, illegal agents recover the authentic brand packaging barrels, and then fill the fake glue to sell, thereby damaging the interests of consumers; third, the brand is completely counterfeited.

Judge's weapon: first, do everything possible to obtain evidence, involving 50 thousand yuan will be punished by industrial and commercial administration; two, strengthen self protection; third, open stores in various regions.

Case four: does the shoe brand and shoe buckle used in the market purchase are used on shoe samples to cause unintentional infringement?

The judge concluded that shoe factories should bear relevant responsibilities.

The Forum on intellectual property rights has benefited greatly from the doubts and doubts of shoemaking enterprises. The judges also hope that they can interact with Wenling shoe companies more frequently in the future, so that enterprises can abide by the law and promote enterprises, and escort Wenling footwear industry with legal authority.